Tuesday, June 16, 2009

Mcdonalds Breakfast Hours



(An unexpected log or diary of a lazy writer)

06/17/1909:

Dictionary :

Surely the reader will have witnessed countless times in the following situation: a well-known speaker, displaying his enormous ancestry, drop a word in passing unusual and obscure meaning. His interlocutor, bewildered, he interrupts the conspicuous require the definition of the word in question. The initiated is unable to define it and fall into disrepute of all present.

Now, read what is written down here and I wonder: Am I able to or will any of my readers, to define the word "ancestry," "overwhelmed", "conspicuous" and "opened"? And going even further: Can we define some of the words I used or perhaps any word? In short: Do the words meaning?


18/06/2009

language game:

And did you know that the type being edited by misusing a word and complaining saying "You stay in semantics." One would like to answer: "Is that the world is a matter of semantics"


Rare Explanation:

Russell believed that words were " rigid designators", a sort of mental labels we put them on things. The problem (in my humble opinion) is that these labels are a very static world. We should think of a more dynamic scheme, in a sort of designators not-so-rigid updatable and fallible. Even so we still have the problem of what is an object.


"Being" is a noun, "am", a verb:

And if no meaning is not it because, after all, there is no substantiality ? And in a world without substance, in which what we call being is not only what happens, should not apply to a new ontological metaphysics, ie a metaphysics of what happens and not the authorities?


Mustard does not exist:

Joseph K and Rudolph And gather in the dining room of the factory for lunch. Joseph , The delay in reading from a jar of mustard. Rudolph asks if something bad happens, to what Joseph responds, reading the bottle label:

Joseph : - Ingredients: mayonnaise and ketchup "Rudolph
: - What about that?

Joseph making jars of mayonnaise and ketchup and read respectively:

Joseph "Mayonnaise: Ingredients: mustard and ketchup " Ketchup:" mayonnaise and mustard
Rudolph - Je, je ... Joseph
: "The mustard does not exist ... Neither the mayonnaise, ketchup or the ... Rudolph
: - (appalled) Mmm ... Fuck Aristotle !


06/19/2009

These Bolivians!:

Have not ever had the feeling that we take for things that are well-known contradictions? What is it that the exception proves the rule? The exception is demonstrating the invalidity of the rule. Imagine a group that includes Argentina, Brazil, Uruguay and Bolivia. Imagine that is described as: "x such that x, belongs to all South American countries that won World Cup." "And Bolivia?" Ask the student's last bank (always the last of the bank) " Bolivia is the exception that proves the rule"


Tenth:

end with the tenth of Nicolás Fernández of Moratín , which always struck me as funny *:


Asombróse a Portuguese
to see that in his early childhood
all children in France
know speak French. Art
evil is
said twisting his mustache,
that speaking gringo,
a fidalgo in Portugal reaches
old and speaks ill
and here, parla a boy.

______________ * The term "smart humor" is a tautology?


0 comments:

Post a Comment